Evidence into judgment

Position Statements

Last reviewed September 2, 2026

Briefings explain what the evidence shows. Position statements address the next question: what should follow from it?

This section makes Krigsvold’s advocacy explicit and testable. A position is not presented as a scientific finding merely because science informs it. Each statement separates its factual basis from its judgment and includes:

  • a proposition that can be accepted, rejected, or revised;
  • supporting evidence linked to primary institutions and sources;
  • a recommended course of action;
  • limits, costs, uncertainties, and tradeoffs;
  • publication and review dates; and
  • a route for corrections.

Positions may change when the evidence, available choices, or consequences change. A revision should be visible rather than silently passed off as the position that was always held.

The relationship among the site’s three records is deliberate: Briefings explain; positions argue; the Annual Record shows what was done.